THE MOST FROM THE COAST !

..


 Coastweek website


XINHUA NEWS SERVICE REPORTS FROM THE AFRICAN CONTINENT

 

Historic Ruling: Kenya Supreme Court orders new Presidential vote | Coastweek

NAIROBI (Xinhua) -- The Kenya Supreme Court judges  [from left] Njoki Ndungu, Smokin Wanjala, Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu, Chief Justice David Maraga, Jackton Ojwang and Isaac Lenaola are seen after nullifying the victory of President Uhuru Kenya at the Supreme Court in Nairobi, capital of Kenya, Sept. 1, 2017. Kenya’s Supreme Court on Friday declared the Aug. 8 presidential election null and void and ordered a repeat of similar exercise within 60 days. Chief Justice and President of Supreme Court David Maraga said the election where the incumbent Uhuru Kenyatta was declared the winner had gross irregularities which affected the integrity of elections. XINHUA PHOTO - FRED MUTUNE

Historic Ruling: Kenya Supreme Court orders new Presidential vote

by Christine Lagat and David Musyoka NAIROBI (Xinhua) -- Kenya’s Supreme Court on Friday declared presidential election null and void and ordered a repeat of similar exercise within 60 days.

Chief Justice and President of Supreme Court David Maraga said the Aug. 8 election where incumbent President Uhuru Kenyatta was declared the winner had gross irregularities.

"The presidential elections held on Aug. 8 were not conducted in accordance with the constitution and therefore declare them null and void," said Maraga.

Kenyans have waited anxiously for the apex court to make a ruling on the election petition filed by opposition National Super Alliance (NASA) presidential candidate, Raila Odinga, who opposed Kenyatta’s victory saying it was flawed.

Odinga in his petition cited massive electoral practices that included hacking of gadgets used for votes transmission as well as use of state resources by the incumbent during the campaign.

Four judges ruled in favor of Odinga’s petition challenging the results, while two ruled against.

Maraga said the Independent Electoral and Boundary Commission (IEBC) failed, neglected or refused to conduct election in keeping with laws.

The ruling was described as historic by legal experts who noted that nullification of presidential elections is a rare occurrence in Africa.

The poll marked the fourth time 72 year-old Odinga had lost an election, often citing irregularities. However, the Friday ruling is the first time a court has supported his claim.

When the opposition leader disputed Kenyatta’s victory after a similarly flawed election in 2013, the judges ruled that the election should stand, even though results from much of the country are not available even now.

Maraga said that he will not read the full judgment on Friday as it would take too long and people are anticipating the result.

He said he will soon announce what he calls the "determination" of the court.

During the ruling, Maraga said the court found no evidence of misconduct on the part of the third respondent who is Kenyatta.

Two judges—Justices Jackton Ojwang’ and Lucy Ndung’u—dissented against the majority decision. Ndung’u said the election was conducted in accordance with constitution.

Ojwang’ said the petitioner did not have enough evidence.

The electoral body had previously declared Kenyatta the winner after garnering 54 percent of the votes cast. Kenyatta garnered 8.22 million against Odinga’s 6.82 million.

Odinga claimed the election was rigged in favor of Kenyatta through hacking and manipulation of the electronic vote-counting system.

           

Remember: you read it first at coastweek.com !


 

SPECIAL
OFFERS

WEEKEND
GETAWAYS

WITH

SERENA

 

 

TO ADVERTISE ON THIS WEB SITE:  www.coastweek.com
Please contact

MOMBASA - GULSHAN JIVRAJ, Mobile: 0722 775164 Tel: (+254) (41) 2230130 /
Wireless: 020 3549187 e-mail: info@coastweek.com

NAIROBI - ANJUM H. ASODIA, Mobile: 0733 775446 Tel: (+254) (020) 3744459
e-mail: anjum@asodia.co.ke

 
    © Coastweek Newspapers Limited               Tel: (+254) (41) 2230130  |  Wireless: 020 3549187  |  E-mail: info@coastweek.com